DEAR READERS: ProCon.org is your oasis for unbiased, ad-free information on important issues. We survive on donations, averaging $22. If every reader gave $3 now, we could keep going for years.Please help.
DEAR PROCON.ORG READERS: We’re being outspent by biased organizations that use millions of dollars to misinform you. This week we’re asking our readers to help us. We survive on donations, which keep us independent and ad-free. If every one of our readers gave $3 now, the price of a cup of coffee, our fundraiser would be over. We’re a small nonprofit, but it costs a lot to keep our servers, research staff, and programs going. ProCon.org is your oasis on the Internet for unbiased information on important issues. If ProCon.org is useful to you, please take a minute to keep us online and ad-free. Thank you.
Not Clearly Pro or Con to the question "Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed?"
"Our research has revealed that $4 billion of state and federal taxpayer money has been expended administering the death penalty in California since 1978, with a cost in 2009 of approximately $184 million above what taxpayers would have spent without the death penalty… These totals do not include the additional funds the state is poised to spend to maintain the current broken system...
In cases in which a defendant faces a maximum penalty of life without the possibility of parole, rather than the death penalty, there is no penalty phase trial at all. Thus, the government would not incur these costly expenditures if the death penalty were abolished…
The costs associated with death penalty trials that took place between 1983 and 2006 averaged about $1 million more per trial than the costs of average non–death penalty homicide trials. This conclusion is also supported by the fact that there are several significant, easily identifiable costs incurred in every death penalty trial that are not incurred in non–death penalty homicide.”
Cowritten with Arthur L. Alarcon, JD, “Executing the Will of the Voters?: A Roadmap to Mend or End the California Legislature’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Death Penalty Debacle,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, June 2011
Experts Individuals with MDs, JDs, PhDs, other relevant advanced degrees, corrections and government officials with significant involvement in, or related to, death penalty issues. [Note: Experts definition varies by site.]
Involvement and Affiliations:
Adjunct Professor, Law, Loyola Law School
Member, American Society of International Law
Former Associate, McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Law Clerk, Honorable Arthur L. Alarcón, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Sep. 2005-Sep. 2006
Law Clerk, Honorable Erithe A. Smith, United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit, Mar. 2004-Sep. 2005
JD, Loyola Law School, 2002
MA, International History, London School of Economics, 1988
BA, French, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1987
Phone: 213-736-1000 (Loyola Law School main line) Fax: 213-380-3769 Email: None found Website:Loyola Law School
Cowritten with Arthur L. Alarcon, LLB, “Executing the Will of the Voters?: A Roadmap to Mend or End the California Legislature’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Death Penalty Debacle,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, June 2011