Professor of Management Science at Pepperdine University
Not Clearly Pro or Con to the question "Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed?"
"The conclusion that each execution carried out is associated with the saving of dozens of innocent lives creates an extraordinarily difficult moral dilemma for those who campaign against the death penalty. Until now, those activists could look into the eyes of a convicted killer, hear his or her sad story, work tirelessly to set aside the execution and, with that goal accomplished, feel good about themselves for having 'saved a life.' These data suggest that the moral equation is not nearly that simplistic.
It now seems that the proper question to ask goes far beyond the obvious one of 'do we save the life of this convicted criminal?' The more proper question seems to be 'do we save this particular life, at a cost of the lives of dozens of future murder victims?' That is a much more difficult moral dilemma, which deserves wide discussion in a free society."
Cowritten with Roy Adler, "Capital Punishment Works," online.wsj.com, Nov. 2, 2007
Experts Individuals with MDs, JDs, PhDs, or equivalent advanced degrees in fields relevant to death penalty issues. Also top-level government officials (such as foreign leaders, US presidents, Founding Fathers, Supreme Court Justices, members of legislative bodies, cabinet members, military leaders, etc.) with positions relevant to death penalty issues.
Involvement and Affiliations:
Professor of Management Science, Pepperdine University, 1980-present
Teaches courses in Statistics, Operations Management, and Quantitative Analysis
Member, Decision Sciences Institute
Member, Production and Operations Management Society
Reviewer, Applied Business and Entrepreneurship Association International